#linuxcnc-meet Log v0.1

logged_meetings

Recorded agenda
date_time
id
event
id
user
message
2017-06-24 16:59:41
217
start

archivist
!start 201706 meeting started agenda at http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Meeting201706
2017-06-24 17:00:12
218
item
1
archivist
!item 201706 1 Thank Chris Radek for hosting and administering cvs.linuxcnc.org and git.linuxcnc.org for so many years [jepler]
2017-06-24 17:10:30
219
item
2
archivist
!item 201706 2 Move primary git to github and retire the signed-off-by procedure [jepler] https://sourceforge.net/p/emc/mailman/message/35845586/ https://sourceforge.net/p/emc/mailman/message/35881958/
2017-06-24 17:19:38
220
end

archivist
!end 201706 meeting ended agenda at http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Meeting201706
2017-06-24 17:41:18
221
end

archivist
!end 201706 meeting ended agenda at http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Meeting201706


log row count=65
2017-06-24 16:59:41 archivist !start 201706 meeting started agenda at http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Meeting201706
2017-06-24 17:00:12 archivist !item 201706 1 Thank Chris Radek for hosting and administering cvs.linuxcnc.org and git.linuxcnc.org for so many years [jepler]
2017-06-24 17:01:02 jepler hi archivist
2017-06-24 17:01:13 jepler I wish there were a few more people here
2017-06-24 17:01:13 seb_kuzminsky joined chan
2017-06-24 17:01:18 seb_kuzminsky hello
2017-06-24 17:02:02 archivist a bit quiet :)
2017-06-24 17:02:51 jepler item 1 is pretty self explanatory. cradek has maintained the service for many years, and without it we would have been in trouble in the post-sourceforge days.
2017-06-24 17:03:04 jepler he deserves recognition for doing it
2017-06-24 17:03:13 seb_kuzminsky so say we all
2017-06-24 17:03:47 jepler any further discussion?
2017-06-24 17:04:11 seb_kuzminsky no, i think it's uncontrovercial
2017-06-24 17:04:14 archivist a group hug for cradek
2017-06-24 17:04:33 jepler archivist: is this a proposed amendment or just agreement?
2017-06-24 17:04:43 seb_kuzminsky heh
2017-06-24 17:04:48 KimK joined chan
2017-06-24 17:05:14 jepler it's good I put this fluff item in for consideration first, so a few more people can show up
2017-06-24 17:05:48 jepler not sure how we do this, but anyway I move we vote item 1
2017-06-24 17:08:43 seb_kuzminsky i vote "yes" on saying thanks to cradek
2017-06-24 17:08:50 jepler vote yes obviously
2017-06-24 17:08:51 archivist and me
2017-06-24 17:09:14 seb_kuzminsky or wait, am i supposed to say i second the motion to vote, first?
2017-06-24 17:10:23 archivist do we have a written procedure.... I think that is passed, next
2017-06-24 17:10:30 archivist !item 201706 2 Move primary git to github and retire the signed-off-by procedure [jepler] https://sourceforge.net/p/emc/mailman/message/35845586/ https://sourceforge.net/p/emc/mailman/message/35881958/
2017-06-24 17:11:05 jepler I've stated my reasons for this on the mailing list at length. I'm happy to answer any questions about how I envision github working.
2017-06-24 17:11:08 seb_kuzminsky i think this one is uncontroversial too
2017-06-24 17:11:23 jepler seb_kuzminsky: no known problems on the techincal end right (buildbot etc)?
2017-06-24 17:11:30 seb_kuzminsky i've started the github/buildbot integration, but it's not done
2017-06-24 17:11:44 seb_kuzminsky i'm confident it will work, once i put a day or two into it
2017-06-24 17:11:55 seb_kuzminsky if there's buildbot outage until then, i'm ok with that
2017-06-24 17:12:32 seb_kuzminsky github sends a json blob to the buildbot on push and on PR, and there are fields with all the important data
2017-06-24 17:13:00 jepler anything else before we vote?
2017-06-24 17:13:22 seb_kuzminsky cry havoc
2017-06-24 17:13:28 jepler seconded, vote yes
2017-06-24 17:13:44 seb_kuzminsky i vote yes
2017-06-24 17:15:24 archivist as I have never used git in anger, I agree with what you want, yes
2017-06-24 17:15:58 jepler KimK: do you have a vote?
2017-06-24 17:16:16 jepler (my cat may want to vote, or may just want the spot in my lap where the computer is)
2017-06-24 17:17:06 seb_kuzminsky thanks for making this all happen jepler
2017-06-24 17:17:40 archivist and any other business?
2017-06-24 17:18:15 jepler I don't think so, unless we want to abolish the IRC meeting as a surprise last item of business ;-)
2017-06-24 17:18:22 archivist hehe
2017-06-24 17:18:43 seb_kuzminsky nah, i think this cadence of one meeting per year is about right :-)
2017-06-24 17:18:46 seb_kuzminsky see y'all!
2017-06-24 17:19:01 jepler thank you archivist for running the meeting
2017-06-24 17:19:12 archivist !stop 201706 meeting ended agenda at http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Meeting201706
2017-06-24 17:19:45 archivist oops!!!!
2017-06-24 17:20:23 archivist one day I will train me and the bot a bit better
2017-06-24 17:21:58 KimK Ha, the one time I'm nearby and I missed it.
2017-06-24 17:22:21 mozmck joined chan
2017-06-24 17:22:25 archivist ya have to be quick!
2017-06-24 17:22:31 mozmck yes!
2017-06-24 17:22:49 archivist http://meetlog.archivist.info/meeting.php?id=201706
2017-06-24 17:23:31 cradek joined chan
2017-06-24 17:23:35 cradek argh
2017-06-24 17:23:40 cradek did I miss it?
2017-06-24 17:24:00 mozmck heh, looks like I did as well.
2017-06-24 17:24:11 cradek well I'm for it
2017-06-24 17:24:14 mozmck me too
2017-06-24 17:24:15 cradek fwiw
2017-06-24 17:25:24 archivist hmm should hack the db to add votes :)
2017-06-24 17:26:38 jepler a voter-verifiable paper trail it's not
2017-06-24 17:27:43 cradek acting in good faith we are
2017-06-24 17:37:27 jthornton I vote yes
2017-06-24 17:41:18 archivist !end 201706 meeting ended agenda at http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Meeting201706